Getting into a new world

The core of my message

The key to the puzzle is a necessary link between the object and the word defining it. If you call somebody by his name he'll be answering or coming to you. If you refer to an ashtray everybody will certainly think of a receptacle for tobacco ashes. If you refer to God there'll be a variety of ideas about it, because God has never existed.
It looks all the more precarious if you bear in mind that every time they want to analyze the matter they are forced to ask the question: "What's your idea of God?" or "Any idea of God?". Questions that may suggest hundreds of different answers. There's nothing in the world allowing this merry-go-round of viewpoints. Everybody giving his own point of view, while the thing should be one only. They never thought that the object cannot be influenced by the ones having ideas about it. Either it exists or it doesn't.

The placebo effect would easily affect the few people who were really offered the theological virtue called 'faith' at the highest level (the bodies of people ordained for religious service along with the ones simply defined as 'believers'). Don't forget that everything was built up on the oral tradition when neither chemistry nor astronomy were there yet. What's more, this essay discovered a corruption of the word 'God' that dates back to the Jews that wrote down the earliest fragments of the Old Testament between the Seventh and the Sixth century B.C. They couldn't really understand what meaning this word (God, the Lord) was to convey. As this corruption took roots, the greatest disaster of all time spread out all around. The main consequence - a link between the Holy and the divinity - became the greatest misunderstanding, giving rise to the great religions that would haunt the years to come. (June 2, 2004 - 10.22).

No one had been more instrumental than the early average man, whose brain was the equivalent of a today's 8-year-old child, in terms of gullibility. You know that alphabetic writing is one of the main features of Western culture. The best sources have always stated that the knowledge of writing was brought to Greece by the Phoenicians not before 1100 B.C. Here's the main trap they were caught in. How could all these concepts spread over countries that hadn't any knowledge of words and letters? During Moses' lifetime, in the 13th century B.C., no one had letters and words to communicate!

Six or seven centuries later, when the then learned ones began to make it all together, the only basis was an oral tradition that had brought nothing more than chats and uninformed ideas all around. They resembled the accounts we can hear today from boys in conversation. So the things went on for at least six centuries, until the arrival of Jesus, but we've learned by now that the corruption had been already made. This means that Jesus' referring to the Lord or his father (by personal pronouns like HE) was already sort of sham. Whether it was made by Jesus in a genuine way or simply by feeding up illusions we can't ascertain anymore. His devotion and his teachings were obviously genuine, as well as the feelings of the early followers that would be called 'Christians'. Of course, we can no more fall into such an ordinary trap today (June 2, 2004 - 11.22).

Although two thousand years of history have seen a great evolution in time, these roots have remained (for those who didn't go ahead). Meanwhile, the Jewish heritage - being the very first flame - has been highly significant. The names of Jewish prophets and authors have been familiar to all of us. The Jewish maze really charmed us through the ages, despite their captivity in an endless exile. The Jewish Law that was called Torah, after being drawn from the Pentateuch, was considered as 'sacred repetition' (Mishnah) when it became a daily reading. There's a Creator even in the Declaration of Independence. Meanwhile, the Christian heritage - being the second flame - became a widespread belief, with a number of believers that exceeded the Jewish one. Nevertheless, they were simply 'believers', which is no more of some interest today. Actually, they've only shaken words so far.

A crisis that challenged the guidelines of this world led me to state that everything is to be remade all over again. Everything has to be built up again on different grounds. I went so far as to suggest that the word itself should be radically reformed. When something is formatted you do nothing but arrange a surface or an area by dividing it into sectors for storing data. The same is true of this word. Either you fix a partition to convey 'God' with a different meaning or you erase the former idea from your mind by removing it. The latter makes us think of a community of speakers that will never mention God again out of history lessons having a bird's-eye view on the (wrong) past. Here's the core of the problem. Something that can no more be linked with the present time is only a bookish thing. You cannot close your eyes to these facts any longer. (June 2, 2004 - 12.22).

1. You used to mention God. Removing the mask from an empty idea, whose artificial background finally fed many legitimate suspicions, leads to another territory in which you'll have to exert yourself carefully. To carry out the mission without any sense of loss, you'll have to do it all almost inadvertently, without any afterthought. After killing the wrong idea, a longtime sham claimed under false pretenses, you'll face up to the problem by forgetting any image of the Everlasting in everyday situations. There's no one, no Being able to bless the United States or other countries. Thereafter, you'll have to attain knowledge in a particular field replacing the old one.

2. You were among the believers. Your thought was built on shaky foundations. You certainly used to say you were a believer, only because you heard of this word and repeated it again thousands of times accepting that the meaning would be real or true. Do you think there's any point in believing what cannot be shown or proved? You may be the world's greatest believer, but that's nothing when the object believed to exist has never been other than a word in our dictionaries. The existence of one thing can only be its presence under certain circumstances or in a determined place. Your believing in the existence of a piece of soap emitting words would have no meaning at all. This way, your belief comes tumbling down as soon as you convert it into the same line of reasoning. What did you mean by God? Where is the object you were talking about? If an unequivocal answer cannot be found, you've got to give up the former doctrine.

Remember however that:

1) The traditional rules of actions can never be eradicated, unless you do violence to individuals that have the free will in their everyday behaviors (=You can't ever say to them: "Don't do it" or "You are not allowed to do it, from now on");
2) A court of justice is not entitled to change religious customs or texts to be recited
3) We can no more change the country's inscriptions referring to God, as long as they are not unconstitutional (in case, you'll have to change the constitution before).

Any revolution must be made in a natural way. Did they preach? Do it, if you want to replace God. Did they bring God? Well, give them another god if you want to replace the former capital letter. Did they establish a new rule throughout the world? Do it again by yourself now, renewing the old one with your tools. Don't make an application to Courts, whatever you'd like it to be established (or banned). It's down to you.